Preferred equity in real estate financing concept with commercial buildings and digital investment overlay

Using Preferred Equity As Rescue Capital

All good real estate deals are alike. But each deal that doesn’t work out is different. The pandemic hit, occupancy fell, interest rates rose, the lender changed hands, a new building came on the market, lots of things. But they all have one thing in common:  they need more money.

The pickings are generally slim. The value of the property has fallen so you can’t refinance. If you sell the property, existing investors along with any chance of raising money from them for future deals will be wiped out. Existing investors don’t want to invest more money and/or they’re not required to (no “capital call” provisions). Often, the sponsor puts in its own money hoping the market changes, but that can’t last long.

The project needs a new equity investment, but in what form? You can’t sell the class of equity you sold originally because new investors want to step to the front of the line and thereby mitigate risk. A type of equity called “preferred equity” is often used in these situations, but it carries risk for the sponsor and existing investors.

What is Preferred Equity?

Preferred equity is equity that acts a lot like debt. The new investor puts money into the deal and receives a fixed rate of return over a specified period of time, like a loan. The fixed rate of return reflects the distressed nature of the asset. Most important, the new investor receives all its money back before other investors or the sponsor receive anything. The preferred equity isn’t secured by the real estate.

Can You Do It?

There are two reasons why a fund might not be allowed to accept preferred equity.

The first is if the lender’s documents prohibit it. Some do, some don’t. Even if the lender’s documents prohibit preferred equity without lender consent, don’t despair. Lenders don’t lose anything by allowing a preferred equity investment. In fact, a chunk of the new investment often is used to pay down debt, turning a non-performing asset into a performing asset and the lender’s balance sheet and lowering its risk.

Depending on your lender and its documents, preferred equity can be easier if the real estate is owned by a wholly owned subsidiary of the fund.

The second is if, God forbid, your LLC/LP Agreement doesn’t allow it. See this blog post on that topic.

Just as your lender should allow a new preferred equity investment, your existing investors should, also; the alternative might be a foreclosure sale. Contrary to classic economic theory, however, investors are sometimes not wholly rational actors. For one thing, they’re angry, especially if haven’t been fully truthful along the way. Even more important, they hate the idea that new investors will step to the head of the line. 

In my standard documents, I try to deal with that by giving existing investors preemptive rights to buy the preferred equity, i.e., they can buy it themselves. But having those rights doesn’t necessarily make existing investors cheerful. For example, an investor might not have the cash for a new investment. In any case, it’s not rare that an investor declines the preferred equity yet is unhappy.

Tax Implications of Preferred Equity

Preferred equity is equity. The deals are usually structured as “guaranteed payments” under section 707(c) of the Internal Revenue Code because they are calculated without regard to the income of the fund. That makes them immediately deductible by the fund and ordinary income to the new investor.

Securities Law Implications

Preferred equity is a security. You have to find an exemption.

Speed

If you don’t need the consent of your lender or your investors, preferred equity investments can be completed very quickly, like a week or two. That makes them especially attractive in distressed situations.

Variations – What’s Open for Negotiation

The devil is always in the details. Here are some of the terms open to negotiation.

  • Rate of Return:  The new investor’s rate of return, of course.
  • Payment Schedule:  Suppose you settle on a 14% rate of return. That’s not the end of the story. You might, for example, agree that 10% is paid current with 4% deferred.
  • Upside:  In the vanilla form of preferred equity, the new investors doesn’t share in any upside. Like everything else, that’s subject to negotiation. For example, the new investor might share in the upside after existing investors have received a specified IRR.
  • Right to Information:  The new investor typically wants a lot more information than you’ve been giving existing investors.
  • Consent Rights:  Often the new investor will insist on consent rights over major decisions. Many details to negotiate there.
  • Forced Sale Rights:  After some period, if the preferred equity hasn’t been fully repaid, the investor may force a sale. Up for negotiation are what “some period” means, who controls the sale process, whether there’s a minimum price, the duration of the marketing period, and whether the sponsor has a right of first refusal.
  • Removal Rights:  Yikes! Yes, some preferred equity investors want the right to remove the sponsor as manager upon defined trigger events. What are the triggers? Can the sponsor cure defaults? If the sponsor is removed, does its promote disappear? 

In short, preferred equity can save the day, but with the wrong terms it can also ruin your day.

Questions? Let me know.

Markley S. Roderick
Lex Nova Law
10 East Stow Road, Suite 250, Marlton, NJ 08053
P: 856.382.8402 | E: mroderick@lexnovalaw.com

Escrow account crowdfunding portals

By Itself, An Escrow Account Won’t Stop Sponsors From Stealing Investor Money

As reported everywhere, CrowdStreet investors recently suffered very large losses when a sponsor apparently absconded with their money. It’s a very bad thing, not only for those investors but for the real estate crowdfunding industry. You’d almost think this were crypto! 

In the aftermath, many have called for crowdfunding sites to use escrow accounts. My point today is that escrow accounts by themselves aren’t enough.

CrowdStreet hosts offerings under Rule 506(c), where escrow accounts aren’t required. On the other side of the street, in the Reg CF world, funding portals must use an escrow agent. Rule 303(e) even specifies who can serve as the escrow agent (a broker-dealer, a bank, or a credit union) and directs which instructions the funding portal is required to give to the escrow agent under what circumstances. If and when the issuer reaches its target amount the funding portal must instruct the escrow agent to release the funds to the issuer, while if the investor cancels his, her, or its investment commitment or the offering is terminated, the funding portal must instruct the escrow agent to return the funds to the investor.

Now let’s assume exactly such an arrangement had been in place for the doomed offering on CrowdStreet.

The offering would have stipulated a “target amount” of $63 million, with the money held securely in escrow. With the target amount raised, CrowdStreet would have given the escrow agent instructions to release the money to the sponsor, following the regulations to the letter. And the sponsor would have stolen it.

By itself the escrow account wouldn’t have prevented the theft. Extrapolating to Reg CF, the escrow accounts used by funding portals do not prevent theft. They just make the unscrupulous sponsor wait until reaching the target amount to steal the money.

To prevent the theft you have to layer something on top of the escrow agent. In the CrowdStreet offering you could have prevented the theft by wiring the money not to the sponsor but to the title company conducting the closing, with instructions that it would be used only to acquire the property. In a typical Reg CF offering, where the money is being used by the issuer for marketing or other general business purposes, it’s much harder.

This is another reason why the “bad actor” rules are odd. They catch people who have violated the securities laws but not people who have robbed strangers at gunpoint. 

Questions? Let me know

Another Reason Real Estate Sponsors Should Try Crowdfunding

I participated recently in the syndication of a high-quality, income-producing, multi-family project in a top market.

The sponsor raised $4.5 million from a family office. Among the terms of that investment:

  • The sponsor provided 40% of the capital.
  • The investor received $75,000 for making the investment.
  • The sponsor made representations about the property’s condition, including environmental representations.
  • The sponsor guaranteed the proposed renovation of the project as if it were the general contractor.
  • The sponsor was required to provide the investor with lots of financial reports, including audited financial statements.
  • The sponsor was required to update the project’s business plan on a regular basis, subject to the investor’s approval.
  • The LLC Agreement listed 38 separate actions requiring the investor’s consent.
  • The investor had the right to sell the project after three years.
  • The sponsor was subject to all traditional fiduciary obligations, like the director of a public company.
  • The investor had the right to replace and/or sue the sponsor based on mere negligence.
  • If the investor asserted a claim, it could stop all distributions to the sponsor — not just fees and distributions in the nature of a promotion, but distributions made with respect to the sponsor’s capital.
  • The Tax Appendix was itself 18 pages long.

I view that as pretty onerous, especially for a $4.5M investment.

As that deal was being negotiated, real estate Crowdfunding sites were raising $4.5 million and much for individual projects with terms nowhere near as onerous.

At the same time, they’re giving ordinary Americans, not just wealthy family offices, the opportunity to invest in great deals. That’s why the title of this post says “Another.”

New Podcast – In-Depth Commercial Real Estate

In this episode Paul speaks to Crowdfunding attorney Mark Roderick about Crowdfunding in real estate. They go in-depth how the JOBS act that created crowdfunding changed funding portals, advertising, and where the future of raising capital is and what sponsors should focus on and be careful with.

In-Depth Commercial Real Estate

In-Depth Commercial Real Estate is an exploration of the people, ideas, strategies, and methods behind commercial real estate. In each episode, we’ll talk to an expert about a particular topic: from CMBS and cap. rates to innovation and hiring strategies, and everything in between.

Disclaimer: This real estate podcast is for informational and educational purposes only and does not imply suitability. The views and opinions expressed by the presenters are their own. The information is not intended as investment advice.For any inquiries or comments, you can reach us as info@indepthrealestate.com.

Questions? Let me know.

The High Return Real Estate Show Podcast: Crowdfunding For Real Estate Investors 

2019-10-22_10-03-37CLICK HERE TO LISTEN

Jack gets the day off, and Shecky gets to have a one-on-one conversation with Mark Roderick, the leading Crowdfunding and FinTech lawyer in the US.

In this episode, you’ll learn…

  • What is Crowdfunding?
  • The two different kinds of Crowdfunding
  • What and who to look for in a Crowdfunding company.
  • How does Crowdfunding apply to Real Estate Investing?
  • Who are the big players in the Crowdfunding space?
  • The three types of Equity Crowdfunding

This episode is a MUST listen to anyone wanting to understand how technology is changing our investing landscape!

Questions? Let me know.

REITS vs. Pass Through Entities: Section 199A and Real Estate Crowdfunding

Skyscraper Buildings Made From Dollar Banknotes

The 2017 tax act added §199A to the Internal Revenue Code and, with it, two complementary tax deductions:

  • A deduction of up to 20% of the income from a limited partnership, limited liability company, or other “pass through” entity.
  • A deduction equal to 20% of “qualified REIT dividends.”

Which is better for sponsors and investors?

As described here, the 20% deduction for pass-through entities is enormously complicated. Most important, the deduction can be limited for taxpayers whose personal taxable income exceeds $157,500 ($315,000 for a married couple filing jointly). These limits depend on the W-2 wages paid by the pass-through entity (not much for most real estate syndications) and the cost of the entity’s depreciable property (pretty substantial for most real estate syndications). And, naturally, those limits are themselves subject to special rules and definitions.

In contrast, the 20% deduction for qualified REIT dividends (which includes most dividends from REITs, other than capital gain dividends) is straightforward, with no cutdown for higher-income taxpayers.

Does that mean §199A favors REITs over LLCs and other pass-through entities? Not necessarily.

The key is that most real estate syndications don’t generate taxable income. Typically, the depreciation from the building “shelters” the net cash flow, at least during the early years of the project. The tax-favored nature of real estate is, in fact, part of what makes it such an attractive investment in the first place.

If an investor in an LLC is receiving cash flow from the syndication and paying zero tax, the 20% deduction of §199A is irrelevant. And, for that matter, so is the 20% deduction for REIT dividends. If a REIT isn’t generating taxable income because its cash flow is sheltered by depreciation, then its distribution will probably treated as a non-taxable return of capital rather than a taxable dividend.

As discussed here, the key advantage of a REIT over an LLC or other pass-through entity is that the LLC investor receives a complicated K-1 while a REIT investor receives a simple 1099. The relative simplicity of the 20% deduction for REIT dividends over the 20% deduction for pass-through entities is nice, but wouldn’t tip the balance in favor of a REIT by itself.

Questions? Let me know.

School for Startups Radio: Crowdfunding Update with Mark Roderick

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN

Mark Roderick appeared on School for Startups Radio with Jim Beach to discuss the current state of crowdfunding and how the industry is progressing. He discusses the booming real estate crowdfunding industry and how the rest of the crowdfunding space measures up.

Syndications, Cryptocurrencies and Crowdfunding, Oh My!

Real Estate Nerds Podcast: Syndications, Cryptocurrencies and Crowdfunding, Oh My!

real estate nerdsCLICK HERE TO LISTEN

Mark Roderick fills us in on how the rich can take care of themselves and the non-rich need the government which is why he thinks crowdfunding is so important to the regular Joe. Since the JOBS Act of 2012, Mark has spent much of his time in the crowdfunding space.

If you have ever thought to yourself the internet is a ruthless landscape slowly squeezing the middleman and driving human being up the value chain? Then you’ll want to tune into this week’s episode where Mark will explain everything from syndications to cryptocurrencies to crowdfunding, oh my!

Questions? Let me know.

The Real Estate Way to Wealth and Freedom Podcast

WEALTH AND FREEDOM PODCAST

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN

In this episode of The Real Estate Way to Wealth and Freedom, you will learn:

  • Crowdfunding – what it is and how it relates to real estate
  • Comparing and contrasting crowdfunding and syndication
  • How much money you can raise and who you can raise money from
  • Title 2, Title 3, & Title 4 crowdfunding – what to know
  • Predictions of how technology will impact real estate investing in the future

Questions? Let me know.

A Millennial’s Guide to Real Estate Investing Podcast

MSR millenials guide to RE investingCLICK HERE TO LISTEN

On this episode of A Millennial’s Guide to Real Estate Investing, host Antoine Martel sits down with Mark Roderick, a leading crowdfunding, investing and fintech lawyer. They talk about blockchain, crowdfunding, the JOBS act, and how all of these things are going to be changing the real estate industry. Also discussed are the different types of crowdfunding flavors and how each of them work.

Questions? Let me know.